Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fliers vs. Outliers"
(Created page with "This needs a lot of work. Think I figured out what to do with it.<br />~~~~") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This needs a lot of work. Think I figured out what to do with it.<br />[[User:Herb|Herb]] ([[User talk:Herb|talk]]) 00:05, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | This needs a lot of work. Think I figured out what to do with it.<br />[[User:Herb|Herb]] ([[User talk:Herb|talk]]) 00:05, 4 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Replace Flier with Defect in definitions? = | ||
+ | |||
+ | For our purposes I wonder if "Defect" would be a better word to use in the definitions instead of flyer. So there would be two types of fliers - defects and outliers. There is so much history/baggage with the word flier. Defect comes from process control. Particularly from the 6-Sigma technique which is based on a +/-6-sigma process window. | ||
+ | <br />[[User:Herb|Herb]] ([[User talk:Herb|talk]]) 15:02, 5 June 2015 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- |
Latest revision as of 15:02, 5 June 2015
This needs a lot of work. Think I figured out what to do with it.
Herb (talk) 00:05, 4 June 2015 (EDT)
Replace Flier with Defect in definitions?
For our purposes I wonder if "Defect" would be a better word to use in the definitions instead of flyer. So there would be two types of fliers - defects and outliers. There is so much history/baggage with the word flier. Defect comes from process control. Particularly from the 6-Sigma technique which is based on a +/-6-sigma process window.
Herb (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2015 (EDT)