# Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leslie 1993"

(Created page with ""His Monte Carlo analysis shows sample RSD to be most efficient" I think there should be a caveat here that "most efficient" was measured assuming circular groups and that th...") |
|||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | "His Monte Carlo analysis shows sample RSD to be most efficient" | + | "His Monte Carlo analysis shows sample RSD to be '''most efficient''' ..." |

I think there should be a caveat here that "most efficient" was measured assuming circular groups and that there were no flyers. Mean radius would be less sensitive to a flyer than measure based on a standard deviation. | I think there should be a caveat here that "most efficient" was measured assuming circular groups and that there were no flyers. Mean radius would be less sensitive to a flyer than measure based on a standard deviation. |

## Revision as of 21:21, 6 June 2015

"His Monte Carlo analysis shows sample RSD to be **most efficient** ..."

I think there should be a caveat here that "most efficient" was measured assuming circular groups and that there were no flyers. Mean radius would be less sensitive to a flyer than measure based on a standard deviation.

Herb (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2015 (EDT)